Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Barriers and Opportunities
  • Mark H. Ebell MD, MS
  • Dept of Family Practice
  • Michigan State University
2
Diffusion of innovation…
3
Diffusion of innovation…
4
"The barriers to the adoption..."
  • The barriers to the adoption of EMRs in family practice are more pronounced than in perhaps any other specialty.
5
Cottage industry
  • It is still very much a cottage industry




  • 25% solo practice, 8% two physician practice in 1997 (Family Practice Management, May, 1998)
6
Low profit margin
7
Vendor issues
  • Transience of vendors
  • Use of proprietary, closed standards
  • Difficult or impossible to change EMRs
8
User concerns
  • A physician base that is drawn to the specialty by an interest in people, not technology
  • Concern that use of an EMR will slow them down
  • Concern about security
9
Complexity of primary care
  • Any age or organ-system
  • Practice in multiple locations (ED, office(s), hospital(s), nursing home)
  • Average of 2.7 problems and 8 management decisions with each visit (Flocke J Fam Pract 2001; 50: 211-6)
  • Less time per visit: median 15 minutes (Flocke)


10
Overcoming these barriers…
11
Standards
  • Development and/or endorsement by an institution would provide at least the perception of stability
  • Use of open standards for database storage and communication and/or open source software design will assure portability even if a vendor fails
12
Financial incentives
  • Differential reimbursement for physicians using an EMR
  • Must use open database standards and taxonomies, incorporate evidence-based decision support, and electronic prescribing to reduce medical errors to qualify
  • Being advocated by the Leapfrog Group.
13
Financial barriers
  • Or...the EMR must be cheap enough to reduce the perceived financial risk



  • Or all of the above: AAFP initiative to develop an open source EMR at $1500-$2000 per physician
14
Episodes
  • Much of primary care involves the evaluation of patients with poorly differentiated symptoms
  • Sometimes a definitive diagnosis is never made (e.g. dyspepsia, non-specific abdominal pain, acute cough).
  • The EMR must build in the ability to track episodes of care.
  • Examples using ICPC to do this exist here (UM, Lee Green) and in Europe
  • HealthXML must include this ability
15
Ease of use
  • The EMR must be incredibly easy to use, with excellent online support and both self-directed training the opportunity for individual and group instruction.
  • There must be a way to easily enter data for multiple problems during a visit, and to quickly add unanticipated problems to an encounter.
16
Security
  • Compliance with HIPAA standards is built into most EMRs
  • Technology exists now, but requires good practices by physicians
17
Portability
  • It should allow physicians to carry a subset of the data and functinality in a PocketPC or Palm device, as a way to gather and access data while out of the office. This could also be accomplished wirelessly with a client-server model.
18
Research needed
  • Basic research to identify best interfaces
  • Independent consumer research to compare products for ease of use and total cost of ownership
  • Ability to “opt-in” easily to be part of an electronic research network
19
Thank you…