1	Primary Care Informatics Working Group (PCIWG): The Primary Care Informatics Bibliography (PCIB) Andy Steele, MD, MPH, MSc October 23^rd, 2005
2	PCIB: GOAL Develop a comprehensive bibliography of peer-reviewed literature on informatics issues as they relate to primary care Offer database as a resource to PCIWG, AMIA, and ?public
3	PCIB: METHODOLGY MeSH terms: “Medical Informatics” and “Primary Health Care” AND 2003, 2004 Databases: Medline, CINAHL, CANCER-Lit, HealthSTAR American College of Physicians (ACP) Journal Club EMBASE Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
4	PCIB: METHODOLGY Review Criteria Step 1: Read Abstract (reading full article optional) Step 2 “Does this article cover some aspect of Primary Care Informatics? Step 3 Categorize Patient Safety Secondary Uses of Data and Information Clinical communication Security and confidentiality Education and training Patient access to the electronic medical record Internet and other ways of communicating health information The future for primary care informatics Other
5	PCIB: METHODOLGY Step 4: Rate Modified IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics Review Criteria (70 points max) A) Topic's importance to Medical and Health Informatics (0-10) B) Scientific and/or practical impact of the paper to the topic (0-20) C) Quality of scientific and/or technical content (0-20) D) Originality and innovativeness (0-20)
6	Reviewers David Little Frank Sullivan Jeff Suzewits Kevin Johnson Sheila Teasdale Thomas Bronken Andy Steele
7	PCIB: RESULTS Articles for 2003-2004: 255 Articles in PCIB(’03,’04): 119 Review Score Range: 12-70 Review Score Average: 41 ~3-5 minutes/review
8	Some Articles Not Included
9
10
11	PCIB: RESULTS-CD/WEB
12	PCIB: Categories
13	PCIB: Journal Sources % total [Rating] (59 unique journals)
14
15	PCIB: LIMITATIONS Simple literature search Review of abstracts only Reviewer bias, inconsistencies Not concurrent, only 2 years Database has technical/content limitations
16	PCIB: CONCLUSIONS ~ 60 articles a year and growing For the most part, good quality Wide variety of journals Good international representation Wide variety of categories
17	PCIB: NEXT STEPS Review 2005 Disseminate results (pcwig.amia.org) More comprehensive review of top 20 Review back years 2002, 2001, … as able Improve review methodology Just quit ???….
18	Comments Use database to mine articles by categories to get MeSH terms to create search criteria to create more specific databases Recategorize articles against the “Grand Challenges in Medicine” Review top set of articles to get the “top 10” for each year Find the top set of “classical” articles ever written Utilize other research groups/trainees to support next steps