|
1
|
- Alan E Zuckerman MD FAAP
- Georgetown University
- aez@georgetown.edu
|
|
2
|
- NHII Conference July 21-23
- PITAC Report
- NHITC Strategic Framework for HIT
- AAFP EHR Pilot (aka Open Source)
- VA VISTA Lite Open Source
- ASTM Continuity of Care Record
- Physicians EHR Coalition – 19 societies
- SNOMED Vocabulary
- NCVHS eRx Standards for Medcare MMA
|
|
3
|
- Over 50 speakers from government, private industry, and health care
- From DHSS Secretary Thompson to David Brailer, NCHIT
- A love fest for HIT compared to Woodstock
- A visible change in Federal roles
- A change in NHII from Plans to Action
- Considered a “Tipping Point” for HIT
- Huge attendance, international attention
- PITAC and Framework reports
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Revolutionizing Health Care Through Information Technology
- Starting with the State of the Union address, President Bush has
embraced HIT and electronic medical records
- Created the Office of the Health Information Technology Coordinator
- Funding initiatives to encourage public private partnership
|
|
6
|
- Economic Incentives for Investment in Health IT – need a good business
case
- Health Information Exchange
- Facilitating the Sharing of EHR Technologies
- Leveraging the Federal Health IT Investments
- Standardized Clinical Vocabulary
- The Human Machine Interface and EHRs
- Coordination of Federal NHII Development
|
|
7
|
- Unambiguous Patient Identification
- The need for a patient identifier is inescapable even if a universal
number is not politically acceptable in the US
- Encrypted Internet Communication
- Trust Hierarchy and Authentication
- Tracing Access Requests
|
|
8
|
- …the most remarkable feature of this twenty-first century medicine is
that we hold it together with nineteenth century paperwork
- The President of the US now acknowledges that this is unacceptable and
must change
- The EHR is finally recognized as an essential technology for health care
|
|
9
|
- Medical Errors
- Reducing Costs
- Applying Lessons Learned From Advances in Other Fields
- Education and Training of Health Care Professionals
- Privacy and Security of Electronic Health Records
- Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD)
|
|
10
|
- Delivering Consumer-centric and Information-rich Health Care
- A Framework for Strategic Action
- David J Brailer MD PhD National Coordinator for Health Information
Technology
- 4 Goals 12 Strategies
- NHII Strategy 3 Goals for each Topic
|
|
11
|
- Avoid medical errors
- Improve use of resources
- Wasted duplication from lack of communication
- Accelerate diffusion of knowledge
- Reduce variability in access to care
|
|
12
|
- Incentivize EHR adoption
- Low rate loans for EHR adoption
- Update physician anti-kickback protections
- Pay for use of EHR
- Pay for performance programs
- Reduce the risk of EHR investment
- Promote EHR diffusion in rural and underserved areas
|
|
13
|
- Foster regional collaborations
- E-Health Initiative’s Connection Communities for Better Health
- Develop a national health information network
- Technically sound and robustly specified interoperability standards
- Coordinate federal health information systems
|
|
14
|
- Encourage use of Personal Health Records (PHR)
- Prevent duplication and medical errors
- Promote communication
- Enhance informed consumer choice
- Promote use of telehealth systems
- Responds to goal of dissemination to rural and underserved communities
|
|
15
|
- Unify public health surveillance architectures
- Part of bioterrorism response
- Streamline quality and health status monitoring
- DOQIT Pay for Performance
- Guideline compliance
- Accelerate discovery and dissemination
|
|
16
|
- Provide Leadership
- Promote Collaboration
- Develop Policy
- Support financial management
- Enhance communication and outreach
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Consumers (PHR)
- Health Care Providers (incentives)
- 90% of benefits of HIT go to others
- Health Care Organizations (hospitals, clinics, long term care)
- Public health
- System developers (standards, certification)
- Medical researchers (role of NIH)
- Health plans, employers, payers (share cost)
|
|
19
|
- Personal Health (PHR)
- Governance
- Incentives
- Standards and Architecture
- Confidentiality, ethics, privacy, and access
- Measuring progress (metrics)
- Population health
- Medical Research
|
|
20
|
- A “Physical” Infrastructure of a central data repository with all health
data on all patients in a region – Indianapolis Model
- A “Virtual” Infrastructure of standards and interoperability between
participating partner institutions and practices – Santa Barbara Model
- An Index of core data and pointers to where more information is stored –
CCR Model
- Key concept – sharing data between providers, patients, public health,
and research
|
|
21
|
- Open source was never a big part of the project and significant
development was never planned
- This is, and always has been, a study of EHR adoption in small practices
|
|
22
|
- The study is at midpoint with 6 small practices (2 solo) in 6 states
- Funding by vendors – MedPlexus, Siemens, HP
- Very limited evaluation funding from CMS came very late in study that
began without funding
- Focus on practitioner needs in small office and vendor relations
|
|
23
|
- Central role of Information Technology in defining the specialty
- Use of IT to improve quality, boost patient confidence, implement
guidelines, and disseminate knowledge to the point of care
- Essential role of EHR in residency training programs
|
|
24
|
- Part of the goal of leveraging federal investment in HIT
- Involvement of physicians and professional societies in functional
specifications
- Targeted to small office practice
- Still built on MUMPS / Cache architecture but with some open source
options
- A real opportunity for Informatics community
- Need for vendor support involvement
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Inspired by a paper patient safety document from the Massachusetts
Medical Society
- Builds upon a history of “Face Sheet” and “Discharge Summary” projects
- Developed under ASTM through a partnership of
- Maintenance Organizations Professional Societies MMS, AAFP, AAP, AMA,
PSI
- Vendors HIMSS
- Standards ASTM
- Passed on First Ballot April 6, 2004
- Provisional Implementation guide for TEPR 2004
- First implementation guide ballot expected in Sept, 2004
- AAFP Center for Health Information Technology Partners for Patients
Program (Doctors and Vendors will use it)
|
|
27
|
- Improve Patient Safety and Healthcare quality
- Prevent redundant data entry
- Reduce healthcare cost by improving efficiency and effectiveness of care
- Improve continuity of care
- Provide a pathway to increased use of Health Information Technology
- Share information between different organizations and vendor systems
- Be usable by physicians who do not have EHR systems in their offices
- Potential to serve as a report card to monitor compliance with chronic
disease management guidelines
|
|
28
|
- A one time messaging document providing a snapshot in time of
information needed to support clinical decisions
- Value to both patient and provider
- Use of XML to enable both human readable and machine readable documents
- You never know when you will need a CCR so you should produce one for
every visit
- Can be given to patient, sent to the next provider, or stored in data
repository
- Not an EHR – no HPI, ROS, or PE
|
|
29
|
- Change of Primary Care Provider
- Hospital Discharge and return to Primary Care
- Emergency Room visit with primary care follow-up
- Referral to a Specialist with return to primary care
- Routine visits to a new physician in the same group practice
- Auditing outcomes, guideline compliance, and quality of care
|
|
30
|
- Document Date (creation, transmission)
- Patient – most of the details stored in the Actors section
- From
- To
- Purpose – constrained by an enumerated list
- Body – 14 sections of clinical information
- Comment – on the CCR as a whole
- References – Actors and Links
- Signatures – Format not yet fixed
|
|
31
|
- Insurance
- Advance Directives
- Problems
- Family History
- Social History
- Alerts
- Medications
- Immunizations
- Vital Signs
- Results
- Procedures
- Encounters
- Plan Of Care
- Practitioners
|
|
32
|
- Code (for the Title of the section)
- Optional and better done using XSL
- Line Items specific to each section
- Every section is optional, but if included must have at least one line
item
- Reference – an Actor or a Link
- Comment
- The Source tag is now a Reference to an Actor
|
|
33
|
- Repeats for each instance of a line item
- Status
- Participant
- An Actor with a specific role
- Reference
- The Source is a reference to an Actor
- Links to line items in the same or other sections
- Comment
- Multiple comments from different Actors are permitted
|
|
34
|
- Now that we have it, how do we get people to use it?
|
|
35
|
- A comprehensive clinical vocabulary
- Supports the richness of coding required by primary care
- Multi axial coding – precision by combining multiple terms and atributes
- A nomenclature or vocabulary of terms, not a classification like ICHPPC
that is useful for research
- Potential to unify coding for billing and patient care
- Translation to ICD-9 available – will it work
|
|
36
|
- attribute
- body structure
- context-dependent categories
- diseases
- environments and geographic locations
- events
- findings
- observable entities
- organisms
- pharmaceutical / biologic agent
- physical force
- physical objects
- procedures
- qualifer value
- social context
- special concepts
- specimens
- staging and scales
- substances
|
|
37
|
- What is the purpose of AMIA and the PCIWG in a society that has embraced
HIT and change?
|
|
38
|
- Professional societies (AMA, AAFP, AAP, ACP) are responding to member
needs and reimbursement issues
- Physicians EHR Coalition PEHRC formed by 19 medical societies
- Main role may be with vendors
- Primary care is not at the center
- Consolidated Health Informatics CHI increases the power of Standards
Organizations
- Vendors are
- Where is AMIA, PCIWG, and NAPCI?
|
|
39
|
- Shift from educating about informatics to using informatics in training
- Vocabularies and coding
- User interfaces (templates)
- Continutiy of Care
- Defining Interoperabilty
- Security
- Lessons from the International community
|
|
40
|
- Security should not be defined only by HIPAA compliance and patient
privacy
- Authentication
- Access Control
- Access Logging
- Secure transmission
- Encryption (secure storage)
- Digital Signature
- Backup and disaster recovery
- Physical protections and equipment disposal
|
|
41
|
- We must decide how to evolve and adapt
|